looking forward to the future

 
1-Do you think it is important for nurses to be involved in their professional organizations? Why or why not?
2. The Affordable Care Act (“ObamaCare”) has been both praised and vilified. Debate the pros and cons of this legislation and of health-care reform in general.
3. What is your vision of nursing’s future? How will you contribute to shaping it?
4. Interview a nurse educated in a diploma program at least 20 years ago.
a-How did that nurse’s education differ from your education today?
5. Locate the website of a professional organization related to nursing. Bring a copy of the organization’s mission, membership criteria, and standards of practice.
6. Ask five people of different ages and gender who do not work in the health-care field what they think most nurses do. Compile their answers with the answers your classmates collected and summarize them. Compare the summary to what you know nurses actually do.
a-Were the answers realistic?
b-Did they over- or underestimate the responsibilities most nurses have?
c-Did they recognize the wide variety of things nurses do?
d-Was there a difference by age or gender of the person answering the question?
e-What do the results tell you about the public’s image of nursing?
f-What do you think influences their image the most? Explain your answer.
7. Describe the nurse of the future.
a-What does he or she do?
b-Do you think nursing will become a more powerful force in health care?
c-Why or why not?

350 word forum-ccou 202

Clinton and Ohlschlager (2002) emphasize the importance of a counselor’s theology and its effect on the counseling process. Clinton and Ohlschlager also note that our theology informs and shapes our worldview, which ultimately shapes our counseling practice. One of the central issues in the Christian culture today is discerning the will of God. 
Read the article in this module/week by Horton (2009), “Discerning Spiritual Discernment,” and review Case Study 1. Provide a brief summary for each approach of discerning the will of God (bull’s eye, wisdom, and relationship-formation). 
Then, discuss the following questions: 

Which approach does Thomas follow in discerning the will of God for his life?
How would you approach this situation?
Discuss your personal approach using Scripture and class materials and how you think that will affect your decision-making process.
How would you talk with someone who holds to another approach?

Thomas is a 20 year old college student who is currently a pre-med major. Thomas explains to you that he has been enjoying his major and is getting good grades. Also, his father and grandfather were both doctors, so he is proud to continue on that legacy. However, Thomas has a roommate who is a Biblical Studies major, and he finds himself more interested in his roommate’s work than his own. Additionally, Thomas is very gifted in leadership and teaching and has found himself praying about becoming a pastor. When you ask Thomas how he has been praying about it, he says he has been praying that God would make it clear that He should be a pastor and that all of the doors should open for him in that endeavor if that is God’s will for his life.The post 350 word forum-ccou 202 first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

Asthma – Nursing Essay Tutors

The nurse is caring for a patient who has a history of asthma and is currently admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. Discuss the pathophysiology of asthma and the impact of pneumonia, assessment information pertinent for the patient, lab work or diagnostic test appropriate for managing the disease process, pharmacology agent that would be appropriate for the patient, and specific nursing interventions addressing the specific needs and care measures. In the discussion discharge planning and teaching should be included

describe the following terms: prejudice, stereotype, discrimination, and ingroup vs. outgroup , homework help

Inmany cases, prejudice stems from the unknown. As individuals, we tendto migrate toward those who may look like us, act like us, and thinklike us. As a result, it may be difficult for us to open our mindsand embrace those whose values, beliefs, and overall sense of selfdiffer from our own.
Forthis assignment, compose a paper that is three to four pages inlength. In your paper, discuss the impacts of prejudice, stereotypes,and discrimination in the context of social psychology. Be sure toaddress the following points:
1.Define and describe the following terms: prejudice, stereotype,discrimination, and ingroup vs. outgroup. Based on your ownexperiences in the social world, can you relate to any of theseterms? Do you identify with a particular term? Why or why not?
2.Examine the social, cognitive, and societal origins of prejudice andstereotypes. Be sure to include specific information regardingcategorization, such as ingroup favoritism and the outgrouphomogeneity effect, norms, competition for resources, and socialinequalities. Of the categories presented, which do you think are themost significant in our society and in your particular community?
3.Analyze the influences that promote stereotyping, and offerstrategies to reduce prejudice. What are the consequences ofstereotyping and discrimination? Who does this behavior hurt, and inwhat ways does it hurt them? Are we inadvertently creatingself-fulfilling prophecies in our society? If so, how can we takesteps to improve attitudes, judgments, and behaviors?
Yourpaper must include an introduction, a thesis statement, and aconclusion. Your completed assignment should be three to four pagesin length (excluding title and reference pages), include a minimum ofthree references, and follow APA guidelines as outlined in theAshford Writing Center.

Final Care Coordination Plan – Nursing Essay Tutors

 
For this assessment, you will implement the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1. Present the plan to the patient in a face-to-face clinical learning session and collaborate with the patient in evaluating session outcomes and addressing possible revisions to the plan.
NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.
Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply communication, teaching, and learning best practices to the presentation of a care coordination plan to the patient.
You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment. Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care delivered through direct clinical interaction that is logged in the CORE ELMS system. Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes. Evaluate learning session outcomes and the attainment of mutually agreed-upon health goals, in collaboration with a patient. Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience. Evaluate patient satisfaction with the care coordination plan and progress made toward Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators. Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing. Make ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. Preparation
In this assessment, you will implement the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 and communicate the plan to the patient in a professional, culturally sensitive, and ethical manner.
To prepare for the assessment, consider the patient experience and how you will present the plan. Make sure you schedule time accordingly.
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback. Instructions
Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.
For this assessment: Complete the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1. Present the plan to the patient in a face-to-face clinical learning session. Communicate in a professional, culturally sensitive, and ethical manner. Collaborate with the patient in evaluating session outcomes and addressing possible revisions to the plan.
Reminder: The time you spend presenting your final care coordination plan must be logged in the CORE ELMS system. The total time spent in securing individual participation in this activity in Assessment 1 and presenting your plan in this assessment must be at least three hours. The CORE ELMS link is located in the courseroom navigation menu.
Please be advised that the Volunteer Experience form requires that you provide the name and contact information for at least one individual with whom you worked as part of your direct clinical activity. Your faculty may reach out to this individual to verify that you have accurately documented and completed your clinical hours. Document Format and Length
Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be 5–7 pages in length. Supporting Evidence
Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2020 resources. Cite at least three credible sources. Grading Requirements
The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care delivered through direct clinical interaction that is logged in the CORE ELMS system. Address three patient health issues. Design an intervention for each health issue. Identify three community resources for each health intervention, so the patient may make an informed decision about what resources to use. Make ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. Consider the practical effects of specific decisions. Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. Cite specific health policy provisions. Evaluate learning session outcomes and the attainment of mutually agreed-upon health goals, in collaboration with the patient. What aspects of the session would you change? How might revisions to the plan improve future outcomes? Evaluate patient satisfaction with the care coordination plan and progress made toward Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators. What changes would you recommend to improve patient satisfaction and better align the session with Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators? Additional Requirements
Before submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.
Grading Rubric:
1.  Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care delivered through direct clinical interaction that is logged in the CORE ELMS system. 
Passing Grade:  Designs comprehensive, patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care that reflect patient needs and preferences and the availability of essential resources delivered through direct clinical interaction that is logged in the CORE ELMS system. 
2.  Make ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. 
Passing Grade:  Makes insightful ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions, informed by relevant ethical considerations, the practical effects of specific actions, and the significance of key uncertainties. 
3.  Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. 
Passing Grade:  Identifies relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care, based on precise and accurate interpretations of relevant policy provisions. Makes valid, insightful inferences. 
4.  Evaluate learning session outcomes and the attainment of mutually agreed-upon health goals, in collaboration with the patient. 
Passing Grade:  Evaluates learning session outcomes and the attainment of mutually agreed-upon health goals, in collaboration with the patient. Clearly explains the need for revisions to similar future sessions. 
5.  Evaluate patient satisfaction with the care coordination plan and progress made toward Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators. 
Passing Grade:  Evaluates patient satisfaction with the care coordination plan and progress made toward Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators. Clearly explains the need for changes to enhance patient satisfactions and better align future sessions with Healthy People 2020 goals and leading health indicators. 

need by Saturday No plagarisim

Ethical Decision Making
Identify any ethical violation and then describe the most ethical response.  Be sure to provide your rationale and reference any pertinent Ethical Codes/Standards. Each Case Response must be answered with a minimum of 150 words, but not more than 250 words (not including any references).
1) Case 2 Jake Oliver was filled with guilt when he arrived for his initial appointment with psychologist, Dr. John Wang.  After asking and receiving assurance that their conversations would be confidential, Mr. Oliver disclosed that, two months earlier, he had murdered his alcoholic wife of 12 years due to her alleged sexual affairs and the physical abuse she inflicted upon him.  He described that one night, when she arrived home inebriated and as she was bathing, he held her head under the water until she died.  Her death was ruled an accidental drowning by the medical examiner.  Jake had gotten away with the crime and was now having some feelings of guilt for killing his wife.
2) Case 1 After the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman a clinical social worker (Susan Forward) who had 2 therapeutic sessions with Nicole Simpson in 1992, made public comments about Nicole Brown’s private disclosures.  Specifically, after Nicole Simpson’s death Susan told reporters that Nicole Brown Simpson, had told her, during the course of the therapeutic sessions, that she had experienced abuse at the hand of OJ Simpson.  The post need by Saturday No plagarisim first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

Dr.Manahll only

  
In 500 word minimum, summarize and reflect on the process of creating a unit plan in English language arts. How does your unit plan help students successfully apply their developing skills to different situations, materials, and ideas? ( Must mention in the reflection components of the lesson plan I created – Please mention 2 activities mentioned above and how it helped children in developing skills such as comprehension , writing, speaking, listening, key details etc – has to be specific to my lesson unit so reading prior to writing is a must).
What challenges did you face when trying to meet the developmental needs of all students (catering to all levels – below, at level, or above)? 
How can family and community support the instruction and selected instructional strategies? (Please mention an letter of introduction of unit being sent home to family with at home activities that can be done with child to extend learning at home).
The post Dr.Manahll only appeared first on Nursing Essay Tutors.
Dr.Manahll only was first posted on April 14, 2024 at 4:56 pm.©2019 "nursingassignmenttutor". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at [email protected]

Assignment 2: Case Study Development and Theoretical Explanation

In today’s world, stress is inescapable. Stress can be a major factor in physical and psychological illnesses. Stress is closely related to fear, panic, and anxiety. A number of relatively common psychological disturbances share symptoms that include anxiety as a central component. The somatic symptom disorders involve a preoccupation with the body or a medical illness. The dissociative disorders involve an alteration in consciousness or memory such as amnesia or, in an extreme case, the development of multiple personalities as in dissociative identity disorder.Below is a Sample Case – WoodyClick to review the sample case (do not use Woody in your M2 A2 assignment analysis).
Click to download transcriptReview the sample case. Download and study the guidelines for developing cases. Develop one original fictional case study that portrays a specific diagnosis within the categories of: anxiety, somatic symptom disorders, or dissociative disorders.
The case description must include all of the DSM criteria necessary to diagnose that disorder, but may also include additional symptoms not found within that diagnostic category. Include some demographic background of the fictional case subject. This portion of the assignment should be 1 to 1 ½ pages.
Mental health professionals are often trained in one or more theoretical orientations. Each theoretical orientation provides a specific insight into why a person acts the way he or she does. The theoretical orientation also guides the professional’s choice of treatment options to address the symptoms presented by the individual to be treated. Several theoretical explanations of abnormal behavior have been described in your readings for this module. Some of these are biological, psychodynamic, behavioral, existential, cognitive, and sociocultural.
Identify the treatment approach for your case based upon the theory you have chosen to explain the disorder. Then in 2–3 pages, write your own theoretical analysis of case characteristics in relation to the disorder the case represents.
Write the case and theoretical analysis in a 3–4-page paper in Word format. Be sure to include an APA style title page and to cite the online course and the text applying APA standards. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.doc. Use appropriate extensions for any other formats you use. By Wednesday, June 14, 2017, deliver your assignment to the M2: Assignment 2 Dropbox.

Discussion 1: Ethical Leadership – Nursing Essay Tutors

Leaders are exposed to many different sources of ethics education and training. For instance, MBA and other academic programs often have a specific course or learning outcome devoted to ethical practice, organizations often require ethics training for all employees, especially leaders, and there are numerous ethical guidelines that exist that can help leaders avoid ethical violations. However, some leaders continue to commit ethical violations, which raises questions about the root causes of such behavior. As observed with Enron’s corporate leadership, known for one of the largest corporate bankruptcies in American history due to deceptive financial practices, the repercussions for unethical leadership may be irreparable