What is the difference between a disaster recovery plan and a business continuity plan?

What is the difference between a disaster recovery plan and a business continuity plan?

DQ requirement: Note that the requirement is to post your initial response no later than Sunday and you must post one additional post during the week. I recommend your initial posting to be between 200-to-300 words. The replies to fellow students and to the professor should range between 100-to-150 words. All initial posts must contain a properly formatted in-text citation and scholarly reference.

Reply 1:

Difference between a Disaster Recovery Plan and a Business Continuity Plan

A disaster recovery plan outlines the systematic approaches that a business can employ to prevent or deal with unplanned incidents (Prazeres & Lopes, 2014). The main aim is minimizing the impact of risks. A business continuity plan also outlines the prevention and recovery mechanisms, but these ensure that a business continues operations even during times of disaster (Ghandour, 2014). In case of emergency situation, the plan allows the company to resume its normal operations within the shortest time possible. It is important to note that most business continuity plans will often involve disaster recovery plans.

There is a difference between the two processes. A disaster recovery plan becomes useful in the case of the occurrence of an incident. The implication of this is that the business risks having its systems down for some time, which may lead to losses (Yang et al., 2016). Since the plan is for use only after a disaster, most stakeholders do not know how to respond in times of emergency. The idea is also at a failure risk since most businesses have never tested it. A business continuity plan is useful before and even during a disaster. The policy ensures that there are already systems in place to keep the business afloat (Ghandour, 2014). In short, a disaster recovery plan is more reactive, while a business continuity plan is more proactive.

Another difference is that the disaster recovery plan allows a business to facilitate the repair of broken equipment and restoration of lost data. The procedure takes place after a company has closed down, and thus, there is ample time for these activities. In most organizations, these plans are known to be most helpful for the IT department (Yang et al., 2016). A business continuity plan promotes minimal outages; thus, there is no time for these maintenance activities. The program cuts across all departments of a business.


Many individuals utilize the terms debacle recuperation (DR) and business congruity (BC) designs reciprocally, however in fact there is a distinction. A fiasco recuperation plan is increasingly responsive while a business congruity plan is progressively proactive.

With calamity recuperation, your DR plan gets a move on something turns out badly, however you chance data frameworks being down for some time. Truth be told, numerous individuals don’t realize exactly to what extent it’ll take since they’ve never tried their fiasco recuperation plans. With business coherence, you have frameworks set up that “bomb over” and enable key frameworks to keep awake and running and the business above water. A few people contend that DR is dead however I don’t believe that is valid. Until most organizations have controls set up to have the option to sensibly keep up their frameworks in case of a disturbance (which is all around impossible) nobody can sensibly guarantee catastrophe recuperation is dead.

Business coherence (BC) and debacle recuperation (DR) are firmly related practices that help an association’s capacity to stay operational after an unfavorable occasion. The objective of BC/DR is to restrict hazard and get an association running as near ordinary as conceivable after a surprising intrusion. As digital dangers increment and the resilience for personal time diminishes, business coherence and catastrophe recuperation gain significance. These practices empower an association to financially recover after issues happen, diminish the danger of information misfortune and reputational hurt, and improve activities while diminishing the opportunity of crises. The pattern of consolidating business coherence and fiasco recuperation into a solitary term (BCDR) is the aftereffect of a developing acknowledgment that business and innovation officials need to team up intently when anticipating occurrence reactions as opposed to creating plans in segregation.

BC/DR is a quickly extending business sector for oversaw specialist co-ops (MSPs) in light of the fact that reinforcement contacts such a large number of their clients’ business concerns. Another creating concern is around consistence. The BC/DR market’s development can be attached to the present condition of the little and medium-sized business (SMB) fragment, which makes up the main part of MSPs’ client center. SMBs are likewise bound by numerous individuals of the administrative necessities that are forced on big business size associations, so they should fulfill those equivalent consistence needs.
BCDR experts can support an association and its representatives accomplish strength. Building up a system is a mind boggling process that requires investigate, including directing a business sway examination (BIA) and hazard examination, just as creating BCDR plans, tests, activities and preparing.