Criminal Justice ACCOUNTABILITY AND OFF-DUTY CONDUCT Essay
You’re a member of the disciplinary board for the local police department, responsible for reviewing findings of internal investigations and making recommendations to the chief about the discipline officers accused of misconduct will receive. Three officers are all alleged to have engaged in misconduct while off-duty, or “conduct unbecoming an officer”. This is a serious charge as department policy specifically states “Since the conduct of officers, on- or off-duty, may reflect directly upon the Department, officers must at all times conduct themselves in a manner which does not bring discredit to themselves, the Department, or the City.” See the attached descriptions of alleged misconduct for each officer.
Answer these questions
You can recommend one of three disciplines: (1) Written Reprimand for the officer’s file (chosen if you consider the misconduct to only have a minor negative impact on public safety or professional image); (2) Suspension with or without pay) (chosen if you consider the misconduct to involve a safety risk or have a pronounced negative impact on professional image); or (3) Termination (chosen if you consider the misconduct caused serious harm, is a willful disregard of values, or shows a serious lack of officer integrity).
1. Which discipline do you recommend for Officer H, Officer Q, and Officer R? How does the misconduct warrant that discipline and not something more or less strict?
2. Do you think it’s fair for police organizations to discipline officers for their behavior when they are off-duty? Why do you feel that way?
The post Criminal Justice ACCOUNTABILITY AND OFF-DUTY CONDUCT Essay appeared first on Academic Essay Guru.
